1C Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official 1C Company forum > 1C Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 09-10-2010, 04:25 PM
Doogerie Doogerie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 30
Default

it may just be me but has anyone noticed this is the first update that does not say WIP at the end?
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 09-10-2010, 04:34 PM
ChrisDNT ChrisDNT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 298
Default

I read "awesome" every two posts, but a landscape like this...

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/attachm...8&d=1284120152

... for a 2010/2011 sim is not "awseome" at all. Ground textures look crude, lighting is very "plastic", trees are strange and the general feeling is not of "being there".

Frankly, blind fanboism is worth nothing to a constructive critical process.

Of course, it's WIP, but there's still some way to go to get to something like that (of course, in the limits of the current technology abilities) :

http://www.ehhvphotobook.com/VSH%20B...DSC_0208B.html
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 09-10-2010, 04:36 PM
SlipBall's Avatar
SlipBall SlipBall is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: down Island, NY
Posts: 2,718
Default

Thanks for the up-date, looking great!
__________________



GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 09-10-2010, 04:40 PM
FG28_Kodiak FG28_Kodiak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Swabia->Bavaria->Germany
Posts: 884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
However, the reticle on the 109 gunsight is wrong. This should be changed for release. I am sure many who know a lot about the Luftwaffe could show you what it should look like but here is a good example (I don't have access to any official documents, but this is correct)

I don't know from where you get your information, this shows the Abkommen from orginal Document:





A Video from a later Revi:

Last edited by FG28_Kodiak; 09-10-2010 at 04:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 09-10-2010, 04:40 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisDNT View Post
I read "awesome" every two posts, but a landscape like this...

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/attachm...8&d=1284120152

... for a 2010/2011 sim is not "awseome" at all. Ground textures look crude, lighting is very "plastic", trees are strange and the general feeling is not of "being there".

Frankly, blind fanboism is worth nothing to a constructive critical process.

Of course, it's WIP, but there's still some way to go to get to something like that (of course, in the limits of the current technology abilities) :

http://www.ehhvphotobook.com/VSH%20B...DSC_0208B.html

I'd imagine the landscape is very much WIP. I agree with you that the textures are poor, but the trees are steadily improving. I can imagine that something like that picture of yours is possible. It's all relative on the placing of the field textures and then the placing of the trees.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 09-10-2010, 04:44 PM
dali dali is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 49
Default

if you look closely - on the second shot you can see a man in the 3rd window from the left on the second floor (westminster). His fingers are too small.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 09-10-2010, 04:48 PM
Thunderbolt56 Thunderbolt56 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 398
Default

Cool stuff. I just hope the "Jesus mode" that allows people to walk on water is a server side toggle like the old Wonder Woman view was in IL2.

Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 09-10-2010, 04:57 PM
csThor csThor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,212
Cool

Oleg, Ilya ... I just sent a mail re: the yellow ID markings on the 109. Just a comment.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 09-10-2010, 05:02 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FG28_Kodiak View Post
I don't know from where you get your information, but from orginal Document:

From experts I have spoken too, I have been led to believe that that is the later type of reticle. In the BoB, the type I showed were the type in use. But this is as far as I have been told. The BDG who have worked on BoB2 are a very knowledgeable bunch, so changing the reticle to the type I pictured would have come from many hours spent researching. by all means, search the a2a BoB2 forum as there may be an answer then, but I am pretty certain this was the type used in 1940.

EDIT-I say this, but your picture shows a c12/c which was in use in the battle....(although it was used after too I think) In any case, I am no expert and I'm basing by views around others. I may pose the question on the A2A forum and see what the answer is. I am just confused now...

Last edited by philip.ed; 09-10-2010 at 05:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 09-10-2010, 05:07 PM
csThor csThor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,212
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Codex View Post
I nominate csThor for quality control
I made those emblems and collected what markings need to go where. I am allowed to grumble.


KG 30


I./JG 27


4./ZG 26


5./JG 51
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 1C Company. All rights reserved.