1C Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official 1C Company forum > 1C Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-19-2011, 07:56 PM
SEE SEE is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,677
Default I Want my 4.09 Spit FM's back.........

..............in 4.10 'to be released' fix patch! Pleeeze?..... otherwise I will throw my toys out of the pram! Launched a Dgen campaign for the Seafire this week (in 4.10) and the only thing it had in common with 4.09 is the variant....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-19-2011, 08:05 PM
Azimech's Avatar
Azimech Azimech is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Leerdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 428
Default

Let me guess... yours flies backwards?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-19-2011, 08:21 PM
JG27CaptStubing JG27CaptStubing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 330
Default

I'm curious... What kind of testing have you done and what are the results. Your complaint is lacking any sort of detail.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-19-2011, 08:35 PM
SEE SEE is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,677
Default

Excessive trim needed as mentioned by others, engine performance is down, cornering speed and stall characteristics make it very twitchy compared to 4.09. In a nutshell it doesn't handle as well as in 4.09. I was so suprised that I launched the campaign in 4.09 to compare with 4.10 and it is very different! Why, after 10 years, was it necessary to change the FM of the Spits?

And pleeze......it's not a 'cissyfire' so no derogatory comments.......
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-19-2011, 08:37 PM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

I couldn't wait for this moment since years...

And it's only the begin!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEE View Post
Why, after 10 years, was it necessary to change the FM of the Spits?
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-19-2011, 08:41 PM
SEE SEE is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6S.Manu View Post
I couldn't wait for this moment since years...

And it's only the begin!!!





yeah......I bet the Yaks and La's don't get screwed and always turn on a dime.....but they're Russian.........
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-19-2011, 08:44 PM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEE View Post
yeah......I bet the Yaks and La's don't get screwed and always turn on a dime.....but they're Russian.........
You're right! Change the LA's FMs too!!!

PS: I'm joking...
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-19-2011, 08:52 PM
SEE SEE is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,677
Default

You Luftwaffe pilots are soooooo predictable.........

Its bad enough not having fuel injection.............. I think TD changed the FM's to encourage spitty pilots to buy CoD........
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-19-2011, 08:58 PM
Tempest123's Avatar
Tempest123 Tempest123 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 386
Default

I dunno what the big deal is, I think they fly fine, The trim issue was discussed and data was shown that it is accurate in another thread. BTW for all the cissyfire people, SISSY is spelled with an S not a C, lol. Okay, now let the sissyfiring continue...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-19-2011, 09:02 PM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEE View Post
You Luftwaffe pilots are soooooo predictable.........

Its bad enough not having fuel injection.............. I think TD changed the FM's to encourage spitty pilots to buy CoD........
LoL!

Oh my gosh! Please I don't want those Spitfires again in CoD!
I loved that beauty plane before "Oleg's Spitfire" in IL2...
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:14 PM.

Based on a design by: Miner Skinz.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 1C Company. All rights reserved.