1C Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official 1C Company forum > 1C Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer 1C: Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #251  
Old 12-24-2011, 06:30 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,247
Default

That is a good point.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #252  
Old 12-24-2011, 06:38 PM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotDavid View Post
Not really. When Luthier announces that the business model for CoD is going to be the same as IL2, and people who like the IL2 business model are complaining, the problem is not a difference of opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
That is a good point.
Wow! it's like talking with a puppet master and his puppet, anywho, people have the right to complain and people have the right to object to those complaints but I don't think it's fair to make it seem as if others opinion in a matter -business model as an example in this case I guess- is totally wrong or totally right either. They are opinions guys, they are not universal truths, they are not concrete. Please tell me I'm not talking to a wall here, show me a sign of understanding.
__________________
  #253  
Old 12-24-2011, 06:40 PM
IamNotDavid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by addman View Post
They are opinions guys
No, it isn't. Luthier said the model will be the same. That isn't opinion, that is FACT.
  #254  
Old 12-24-2011, 06:41 PM
IamNotDavid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by addman View Post
Please tell me I'm not talking to a wall here, show me a sign of understanding.
ditto
  #255  
Old 12-24-2011, 06:41 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
Im basing my opinion on the last 18 months.
Which is fine for you and your agenda..

But the rest of us who are familiar with IL-2 are basing our opinions off the 10+ years of IL-2 and the latest quote from Luther that stated CoD and it's sequels will follow the same methodology

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
Words are cheap.
True..

And I think 'most' would agree that the words based on 18 moths are cheaper than the words based on 10+ years..

Your mileage may and clearly does vary
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #256  
Old 12-24-2011, 06:41 PM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotDavid View Post
No, it isn't. Luthier said the model will be the same. That isn't opinion, that is FACT.
It's not fact until it has happened mate.
__________________
  #257  
Old 12-24-2011, 06:54 PM
adonys adonys is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damixu View Post
Consider this: What if 1C would stop the flight sim development altogether and switched to developing more mass appealing and more lucrative games partly because too demaning crowd and too niche to get moneys worth of effort.
They would be out of business in 3 days after the launch, because other game genre customers would in no way stomach a game released in a state like CoD.

Not they are doing us a favor by working on a ww2 flight sim, but we are doing them a favor for buying and supporting a game in such a state.

I'm sorry, but I'm sure BoM will be in a similar state at its launch, with tons of bugs and broken features too. And you can quote me on it!

I really-really hope I'll be proven wrong, because i do love ww2 (flight) sims, but.. time will tell

Last edited by adonys; 12-24-2011 at 07:00 PM.
  #258  
Old 12-24-2011, 06:59 PM
IamNotDavid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by addman View Post
It's not fact until it has happened mate.
No, it's definitely a fact that he said it. Whether or not they'll actually do it is pointless speculation. My useless speculation is based on past history and common sense. Your useless speculation is based on relentless negativity.
  #259  
Old 12-24-2011, 07:40 PM
242Sqn_Cat 242Sqn_Cat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post

And I think 'most' would agree that the words based on 18 moths are cheaper than the words based on 10+ years..

Just what is it you have against moths anyway?
  #260  
Old 12-24-2011, 08:25 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 242Sqn_Cat View Post
Just what is it you have against moths anyway?
DOH!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:29 AM.

Based on a design by: Miner Skinz.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 1C Company. All rights reserved.