1C Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official 1C Company forum > 1C Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer 1C: Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2012, 08:41 AM
BlackSix BlackSix is offline
Approved Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
Posts: 533
Exclamation Friday Update, January 27, 2012

It’s our pleasure to continue our weekly updates in 2012!

From now on our Friday updates will include both information on Cliffs of Dover (when we have something exciting to reveal) as well as updates on the state of our not-yet-announced sequel.

We’ve already shown you a few screenshots from our next project in our pre-holiday update. You can see it here.

And now, the State of the Project address from project’s lead Ilya “Luthier” Shevchenko

We could have probably avoided a lot of bad blood if I had explained some basics earlier. So let’s take a step back and discuss the specifics of video game development as it exists today.

2012 is not 1999 or 2004. Hardware capabilities and community expectations grow at an exponential rate. In the golden early days of the series – over 10 years ago – we could have written an entire cool new feature in a week, rewritten a complex module in two, or created a new plane in a month. In those days we could offer you something new and exciting to look at every Friday!

Things are not the same today. A single plane model can take a year of work or more! Complex tasks such as changes to AI or flight model take many months of coding and testing. The industry reached this strange stage where the end result does not seem to match the amount of time that went into it. If you compare a late-year 1946 plane with a CoD aircraft, it’s hard to believe that one took a month and the other a year to make. Does it really look 12 times better?

If you drew a diagram of time spent on task vs perceived quality, the curve would be very, very sharp.

It is what it is. It takes a huge amount of time to rise above the bar set by the original Il-2. The illusion of time spent vs quality delivered affects not only the layman but us professional developers as well. We’ve underestimated the amount of time it could take to “do better” quite a few times. We could do it exactly like in Il-2 in a month. But we don’t want to do it like in IL-2. We want to do better. And to reach the next qualitative level you need to spend significantly more time. In some cases, a year instead of a month, or even worse.

Secondly, and I hope this part is obvious to most everyone, games are developed by teams of people with very different skills. They rarely intersect. For example, there are team members who are great at making 3D models of tanks. They can’t just switch over and make a cockpit one day. They’d need many months of retraining. And even more than that, a tank modeler can’t just come in one day and fix a memory leak in the network code. All he can really do is make great tank models regardless of what a network programmer or a map maker are doing.

I’m really hoping this will cut down on cries of “why do we need x when we still have the glaring problem of y!” Each team member does the thing he can do at the speed it can be done. “Hire more programmers” is not a solution either. If your plane can’t fly very fast, putting more pilots in the cockpit won’t do much for its top speed. Especially when your plane is a unique one-off model with controls and other systems quite unlike anything any pilot might have ever handled before.

So we address each issue at its own speed. Some bugs can be fixed very quickly, and they are. We can update a cockpit lever animation or fix a type in a matter of minutes. On the other hand, locating a memory leak can take many long months of dedicated work by some extremely qualified programmers. All bugs are not created equal.

So our general status report is very simple. Everyone is working very hard doing the same thing they were doing a month or a year ago. Graphical programmers are working on graphics. Network programmers are combing through the network code. Plane modelers are building 3D models of aircraft. No one stopped. Nothing was abandoned. On the contrary, the team continues to grow.

I also have to say that under these conditions reporting on intermediate progress is very hard. Say, we’ve measured FPS in the new graphics engine. The engine still has some problems, solving which will have a definite impact on FPS – whether positive or negative is impossible to say. However if we were to announce that in a mission X we’ve increased FPS by Y% on hardware Z, then regardless of the size of the WIP disclaimer, we’d be eating our words for years to come if they turned out to be too optimistic.

So we continue to work, quietly and privately.

The progress is a constant. Graphics are virtually complete. Almost all of the newly introduced bugs are squashed. There are lots of other improvements. The new project as well is advancing at a good pace.

I can’t say anything more than that however, this week like many other weeks. It’ll be ready when it’s ready. And as we all know, nothing good ever comes out of talking about it before it is ready.

PS And I’d like to point this out one more time. There is no conflict between the old and the new. We have one team that works on a single overall task, that is, improving the Il-2 series. Whether it is a new sound engine or a new graphics engine, we don’t make them for CoD or for the sequel. We make them for IL-2 Sturmovik.

(end of producer transmission)

We are also working on improving Russian and German localization with the help of the community.

And now let’s look into the future.

We are very proud to show off another flyable plane from the sequel, the famous Polikarpov I-16. It’s the mainstay of the Soviet air force in the early period of the war. It’s still a work in progress. We will reveal its cockpit at a later time.

Please tune in next week for screenshots of a damaged I-16 as well as something completely different!

Good hunting!

Attached Images
File Type: jpg i16_sc01.jpg (522.1 KB, 1635 views)
File Type: jpg i16_sc02.jpg (498.3 KB, 1316 views)
File Type: jpg i16_sc03.jpg (723.8 KB, 1406 views)
File Type: jpg i16_sc04.jpg (747.6 KB, 1307 views)
File Type: jpg i16_sc05.jpg (726.9 KB, 1472 views)

Last edited by BlackSix; 01-27-2012 at 08:52 AM.
Old 01-27-2012, 08:42 AM
BlackSix BlackSix is offline
Approved Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
Posts: 533

And more:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg i16_sc06.jpg (794.2 KB, 1625 views)
File Type: jpg i16_sc07.jpg (525.5 KB, 1077 views)
File Type: jpg i16_sc08.jpg (504.8 KB, 1039 views)
File Type: jpg i16_sc09.jpg (554.8 KB, 1029 views)
File Type: jpg i16_sc10.jpg (552.3 KB, 995 views)
Old 01-27-2012, 08:44 AM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,804


Thank you for the update! And that Rata looks great!
Old 01-27-2012, 08:46 AM
NSU's Avatar
NSU NSU is offline
Approved Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Heidelberg_Germany
Posts: 251

yes very nice
Old 01-27-2012, 08:50 AM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,124

Thanks guys, great update.

Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Old 01-27-2012, 08:52 AM
NaBkin's Avatar
NaBkin NaBkin is offline
Approved Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 58

Keep up the good work! Thanks!
Old 01-27-2012, 08:55 AM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,196

Thanks for the update! It's good to see things as they are progressing!

It will be very interesting to see the winter landscape for the ski variant or the I-16!
Old 01-27-2012, 09:02 AM
Pato Salvaje's Avatar
Pato Salvaje Pato Salvaje is offline
Approved Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 123

Thank You B6 and Luthier for the update!!
Good job with the I-16!!

Great update. Keep it coming!!
Phenom II X4 970 3,5 Ghz, Gigabyte 890GPA UD3H, 4GB RAM GSKILL RIP-JAWS 1333, Gigabyte 560Ti OC 1GB, W7 64
Old 01-27-2012, 09:02 AM
Viking's Avatar
Viking Viking is offline
Approved Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 456
Default Kap!

As we say here in Thailand.

Old 01-27-2012, 09:04 AM
jayrc's Avatar
jayrc jayrc is offline
Approved Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 339

Looks great
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 1C Company. All rights reserved.