1C Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official 1C Company forum > 1C Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-05-2012, 11:42 PM
jameson jameson is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 221
Default

Fatcat aka FC99 here is a member of TD. He said on 12th Feb. 2012.

"There will be some changes regarding MW50 in 4.11.1 "

Which we all hope will be with us shortly. Read the thread 4.11 and overheat, page 2, post #15.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-06-2012, 12:56 AM
jermin jermin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 238
Default

LOL. Oleg built this entire game using what you called cut and paste data.

It sounds as if you have worked on WW2 German fighters for a long time and is a real expert on MW-50 boost system who dare to question historical facts.

I'd like to see some non-cut-and-paste test result from you to prove the historical data was wrong instead of those sour words.

Sent from my Milestone using Tapatalk
__________________
Why do some people tend to take it for granted that others have poorer knowledge background than themselves
regarding the argument while they actually don't have a clue who they are arguing with in the first place?



Last edited by jermin; 03-06-2012 at 04:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-06-2012, 04:20 AM
jameson jameson is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 221
Default

If you flew 2x 10 mins @110% with mw50, total flight time would be about 35mins. I rest my case.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-06-2012, 04:45 AM
jermin jermin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 238
Default

I fail to see the logic here. Please explain.

I'm still waiting for your evidence.
__________________
Why do some people tend to take it for granted that others have poorer knowledge background than themselves
regarding the argument while they actually don't have a clue who they are arguing with in the first place?



Last edited by jermin; 03-06-2012 at 04:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-06-2012, 05:43 AM
jameson jameson is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 221
Default

That you fail to see the logic, makes this exercise a bit pointless really.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-06-2012, 10:59 PM
Shardur Shardur is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jameson View Post
If you flew 2x 10 mins @110% with mw50, total flight time would be about 35mins. I rest my case.
Poor combat range of the German fighters is a well known fact. However if you are intercepting enemy formations over your own territory 35min of flight time is enough. Nobody says you have to use full engine power for 20min (2x 10min) and if you need more range you shouldn't, but it was historically possible to do so therefore there is no reason why it shouldn't be possible in the game.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-07-2012, 11:15 AM
Upthair Upthair is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 40
Default

Someone was trying to behave like a really highly intelligent guy.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:50 AM
HundertneunGustav HundertneunGustav is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 89
Default

flying by the numbers. by the goddamn numbers, and down to the last percentage and second. The numbers, the holy Data.
Thats what FSX is made for...
f'n ell!!

IL2 1946 4.11 (+mods? dare i say?) is a piece of art, so give some tolerance for artistic licence.
The Pilots back then didnt fly be the numbers either.
ridiculous.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-10-2012, 03:09 AM
WTE_Galway WTE_Galway is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,201
Default

MW50 is not a magic cure all, it just made up for low octane fuel allowing more power with poor fuels.

How people got the idea it was some magical effect that allowed the pilot ten minutes of totally trashing the engine without damage is beyond me.

If your behaviour is bad for the engine without MW50 engaged such behaviour will be as bad or worse for it with the extra power MW50 provided.

The way some people talk you should be able to park a bf109 with chocks on the ground, run the engine up to full throttle and engage mw50 and then expect the engine to last ten minutes because the "book" said that was the maximum time for mw50.

Sillyness.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-10-2012, 03:45 AM
Whacker Whacker is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 132
Default

Here's another idea. How about we try to take all the emotion and armchair mechanicness out of this and try and find some actual sources of data?

I started looking and found this link from the wikipedia DB601 entry: http://www.scribd.com/doc/71362812/1...r-DB-601-A-u-B

Can any of our german speaking friends lese through this bitte and then reporten zu backen hier was ist gesayin ist?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:06 PM.

Based on a design by: Miner Skinz.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 1C Company. All rights reserved.