1C Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official 1C Company forum > 1C Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-03-2018, 08:20 AM
dimlee's Avatar
dimlee dimlee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sita View Post
in fact MBR2 wasn't amphibious airplane at 100 persent meaning of this word ...
MBR was or float ( boat i mean ) version .. or Gear ( wheel/Ski version ..)
for MBR wasn't plan to take off from water surface with attached wheels or ski...

...
But they were used with trolleys as well for pulling up the slip (or other slope) or pulling down to the water. I don't attach pictures as I'm sure you have seen them a lot.
__________________
Q: Mr. Rall, what was the best tactic against the P-47?
A: Against the P-47? Shoot him down!
(Gunther Rall's lecture. June 2003, Finland)
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-03-2018, 09:05 AM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 785
Default

sure... we saw it ... but that trolleys is only ground tech crew equipment ...
__________________
work hard, fly fast

Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-03-2018, 10:55 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dimlee View Post
Well, Antonov designed just gliders in 1930s and assisted Yakovlev a bit. By the way, it was him who worked on improvements of Yak series in 1943-1945.
My mistake, I was thinking of Tupolev. I got confused because so many of his pre-war designs are designated as ANT-## rather than Tu-##.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-04-2018, 10:01 AM
dimlee's Avatar
dimlee dimlee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
My mistake, I was thinking of Tupolev. I got confused because so many of his pre-war designs are designated as ANT-## rather than Tu-##.
No problem. This confuses many even in the Russian speaking community.
ANT, AN, Antey (An-22).
I agree with your comment on Tupolev's designs in general.
__________________
Q: Mr. Rall, what was the best tactic against the P-47?
A: Against the P-47? Shoot him down!
(Gunther Rall's lecture. June 2003, Finland)
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-04-2018, 10:04 AM
dimlee's Avatar
dimlee dimlee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sita View Post
sure... we saw it ... but that trolleys is only ground tech crew equipment ...
So, could it be possible to make those trolleys "appear" only on the ground (as with Me 163), not in the air?
__________________
Q: Mr. Rall, what was the best tactic against the P-47?
A: Against the P-47? Shoot him down!
(Gunther Rall's lecture. June 2003, Finland)
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-04-2018, 10:44 AM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dimlee View Post
So, could it be possible to make those trolleys "appear" only on the ground (as with Me 163), not in the air?
at first as far i know its problematic in Il2 game mechanics .. some kind like with sbp I16 and TB3 ... but here is more difficult ...

and second thing, as far i see it have no sence ... MBR on ground troley need only to deliver flying boat from dry hangar to water surface ... it makes by ground tech crew... or may be some vechicle ... it take some time.... and after it in water ground personal by hands detach bogie chassis and troley and only after it flying boat ready to take off ...
all that process is only prepearing to flight..

not sure that that part of process need here ...
__________________
work hard, fly fast

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-04-2018, 10:47 AM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 785
Default

with me 163 it was part of plane, part of construction .. on me163 you couldn't take off without it.. in case of mbr that thing need only to get in water if you take MBR in flying boat version ...
__________________
work hard, fly fast

Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-05-2018, 10:11 AM
hun_77 hun_77 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3
Default

First to say, I am looking forward to the new patch. It is amazing that you still work on such an old game.

Just to sum up on what you are working:
Maps:
- A new big Channel Map (for 1940 and 1944)
- Donbass Map

New flyable aircraft:
- MBR-2 in 3 versions (as flying boat, with skies, with fixed landing gear)
(There was a time you were working on a He-177, C-47 and (maybe I'm wrong) Ju-52. Will you continue with these planes?)

Do you work on complete new functions (like the navigation features in 4.?? or the new bombing features in 4.13)?

I am glad to see these teaser pics, I hope you publish more...
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-05-2018, 11:45 AM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 785
Default

for today content list of 4.14 is not approved

at current moment main position of 4.14 is

He177
MBR2

and Few Maps ... Donbass, Moscow and few others ... with different seasons

all that thing in work now ... and while we work on it may be something else will catch up to content ... will see...

C47 waits import ... Ju52 still in work .. need do alot of thing wit it ...
__________________
work hard, fly fast

Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-05-2018, 12:35 PM
dimlee's Avatar
dimlee dimlee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sita View Post

and second thing, as far i see it have no sence ... MBR on ground troley need only to deliver flying boat from dry hangar to water surface ... it makes by ground tech crew... or may be some vechicle ... it take some time.... and after it in water ground personal by hands detach bogie chassis and troley and only after it flying boat ready to take off ...
all that process is only prepearing to flight..

not sure that that part of process need here ...
Agree. I did not think about that. Indeed, if pilot is not involved in the process, it does not make sense.
__________________
Q: Mr. Rall, what was the best tactic against the P-47?
A: Against the P-47? Shoot him down!
(Gunther Rall's lecture. June 2003, Finland)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:59 AM.

Based on a design by: Miner Skinz.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 1C Company. All rights reserved.